FLKSX vs. FSLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLKSX (Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund) and FSLSX (Fidelity Value Strategies Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FLKSX returned 9.31%/yr vs 9.07%/yr for FSLSX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLKSX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FSLSX.

Performance

FLKSX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKSX achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 21.04% return.

FLKSX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 3.13%
• YTD: 9.94%
• 6M: 10.81%
• 1Y: 21.99%
• 3Y*: 16.42%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: —

FSLSX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 21.04%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 29.88%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKSX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund	9.94%	14.61%	10.81%	14.87%	-5.16%	24.70%	9.32%	25.16%	-10.42%	12.93%
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	21.04%	0.24%	9.25%	20.54%	-7.37%	33.32%	8.24%	34.54%	-16.90%	9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKSX and FSLSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2017	0.93

The correlation between FLKSX and FSLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLKSX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKSX

FLKSX Risk / Return Rank: 42
FLKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FLKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FLKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FLKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FLKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FSLSX

FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKSX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLKSX	FSLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.73	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.30	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.32	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	3.32	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.92	10.82	-1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLKSX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKSX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLKSX	FSLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	1.73	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.45	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.54	+0.15

Drawdowns

FLKSX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKSX drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKSX and FSLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKSX	FSLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.70%	-69.87%	+33.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.87%	-9.79%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-26.81%	+10.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.82%	-26.81%	+8.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-8.28%	+3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.99%	-0.40%

Volatility

FLKSX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) is 3.28%, while Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that FLKSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLKSX	FSLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	4.27%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.92%	14.50%	-5.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.61%	18.78%	-6.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.83%	20.50%	-5.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.44%	21.92%	-5.48%

FLKSX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKSX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

FLKSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLKSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund	6.70%	7.37%	13.98%	6.70%	3.47%	5.34%	1.47%	2.47%	1.52%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.41%	2.49%	2.13%	7.29%	0.84%	4.84%	14.59%	6.57%	19.71%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKSX and FSLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FLKSX and FSLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLKSX or FSLSX?

FSLSX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to FLKSX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKSX dropped -36.70% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.