PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLKSX vs. FTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLKSX vs. FTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKSX achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than FTSIX's 13.76% return.


FLKSX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.91%
YTD
9.49%
6M
11.56%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*

FTSIX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.73%
YTD
13.76%
6M
14.91%
1Y
28.34%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKSX vs. FTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLKSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund
9.49%14.61%10.81%14.87%-5.16%24.70%9.32%25.16%
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
13.76%6.04%11.86%18.52%-17.63%25.29%19.19%26.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKSX and FTSIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2019

0.91

The correlation between FLKSX and FTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLKSX vs. FTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKSX
FLKSX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FLKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FTSIX
FTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKSX vs. FTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLKSXFTSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

1.77

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

2.61

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

3.96

-1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.69

11.44

-2.75

FLKSX vs. FTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the FTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKSX and FTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLKSXFTSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.77

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.33

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.56

+0.12

Drawdowns

FLKSX vs. FTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKSX drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum FTSIX drawdown of -42.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKSX and FTSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLKSXFTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.70%

-42.12%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-6.80%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-23.30%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

-27.57%

+9.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.39%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-7.66%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.35%

+0.24%

Volatility

FLKSX vs. FTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) is 3.33%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that FLKSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLKSXFTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

4.23%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

11.09%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

15.76%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

19.09%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

23.34%

-6.90%

FLKSX vs. FTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSIX's 2.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLKSX vs. FTSIX - Dividend Comparison

FLKSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than FTSIX's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund
6.73%7.37%13.98%6.70%3.47%5.34%1.47%2.47%1.52%0.63%
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
0.57%0.64%0.84%0.85%0.95%5.50%0.35%2.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FLKSX and FTSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTSIX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FLKSX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKSX dropped -36.70% vs FTSIX's -42.12%.

FLKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKSX and FTSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer