FLKSX vs. EISMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FLKSX (Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund) and EISMX (Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - FLKSX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while EISMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 5 years, FLKSX returned 9.08%/yr vs 3.90%/yr for EISMX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLKSX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EISMX.

Performance

FLKSX vs. EISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKSX achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than EISMX's -1.57% return.

FLKSX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.91%
• YTD: 9.49%
• 6M: 11.56%
• 1Y: 22.47%
• 3Y*: 16.26%
• 5Y*: 9.08%
• 10Y*: —

EISMX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: -1.57%
• 6M: -1.10%
• 1Y: -3.21%
• 3Y*: 7.35%
• 5Y*: 3.90%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKSX vs. EISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund	9.49%	14.61%	10.81%	14.87%	-5.16%	24.70%	9.32%	25.16%	-10.42%	12.93%
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund	-1.57%	-5.66%	17.64%	14.01%	-8.77%	22.02%	11.31%	34.37%	-5.55%	16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKSX and EISMX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2017	0.86

The correlation between FLKSX and EISMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLKSX vs. EISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKSX

FLKSX Risk / Return Rank: 39
FLKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FLKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FLKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FLKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FLKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

EISMX

EISMX Risk / Return Rank: 2
EISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKSX vs. EISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLKSX	EISMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	-0.25	+2.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	-0.27	+2.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.97	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	-0.26	+2.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.69	-0.51	+9.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLKSX vs. EISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the EISMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKSX and EISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLKSX	EISMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	-0.25	+2.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.23	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.53	+0.16

Drawdowns

FLKSX vs. EISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKSX drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum EISMX drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKSX and EISMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKSX	EISMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.70%	-45.32%	+8.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.87%	-14.66%	+5.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-19.39%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.82%	-19.81%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.51%	+12.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-5.82%	+1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	7.41%	-4.82%

Volatility

FLKSX vs. EISMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) is 3.33%, while Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that FLKSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLKSX	EISMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.95%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	11.10%	-2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.63%	15.34%	-2.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.83%	17.12%	-2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.44%	18.86%	-2.42%

FLKSX vs. EISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EISMX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKSX vs. EISMX - Dividend Comparison

FLKSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than EISMX's 6.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund	6.53%	6.43%	7.26%	2.78%	10.37%	10.49%	9.80%	6.52%	7.20%	3.30%	3.58%	6.70%
FLKSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund	6.73%	7.37%	13.98%	6.70%	3.47%	5.34%	1.47%	2.47%	1.52%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKSX and EISMX in my portfolio?

FLKSX and EISMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLKSX or EISMX?

EISMX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to FLKSX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKSX dropped -36.70% vs EISMX's -45.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.