PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLSX vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLSX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLSX achieves a 28.77% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 12.23%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.


FSLSX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.85%
6M
17.27%
YTD
28.77%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
12.23%
ALL TIME*
10.88%

VTI

1D
1.53%
1M
1.38%
6M
9.81%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
14.66%
ALL TIME*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.08B$1.16B$1.24B

FSLSX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
28.77%0.24%9.25%20.54%-7.37%33.32%8.24%34.54%-16.90%17.49%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.18%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLSX and VTI is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001

0.89

The correlation between FSLSX and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLSX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSLSX
FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSLSX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSLSXVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.67

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.70

11.50

-0.80

FSLSX vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLSX and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSLSX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLSX drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLSX and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLSXVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.87%

-55.45%

-14.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-8.92%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.81%

-19.30%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.81%

-25.36%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

-35.00%

-12.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

0.00%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-7.98%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.07%

+0.84%

Volatility

FSLSX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) is 3.26%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that FSLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLSXVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.78%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

10.33%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.73%

13.08%

+5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

17.53%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

18.31%

+3.56%

FSLSX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLSX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%10.41%2.49%2.13%7.29%0.84%4.84%14.59%6.57%19.71%1.26%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLSX and VTI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to FSLSX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLSX dropped -69.87% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLSX and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer