PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLSX vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLSX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLSX achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.39%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return.


FSLSX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.08%
YTD
20.64%
6M
14.54%
1Y
31.77%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
11.39%

VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLSX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
20.64%0.24%9.25%20.54%-7.37%33.32%8.24%34.54%-16.90%17.49%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLSX and VTI is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.90

The correlation between FSLSX and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLSX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLSX
FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLSX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSLSXVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

2.48

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

3.37

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.44

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.33

15.88

-5.55

FSLSX vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLSX and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSLSXVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.48

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.75

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.83

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.51

+0.03

Drawdowns

FSLSX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLSX drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLSX and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLSXVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.87%

-55.45%

-14.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-8.92%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.81%

-19.30%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.81%

-25.36%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

-35.00%

-12.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-8.03%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.93%

+1.06%

Volatility

FSLSX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.86%. This indicates that FSLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLSXVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

2.86%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

9.11%

+5.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

12.15%

+6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.50%

17.40%

+3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

18.30%

+3.62%

FSLSX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLSX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%10.41%2.49%2.13%7.29%0.84%4.84%14.59%6.57%19.71%1.26%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLSX and VTI have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLSX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLSX dropped -69.87% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLSX and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer