PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJP vs. EZET
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLJP vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLJP vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
7.49%26.79%-2.53%
EZET
Franklin Ethereum ETF
-27.89%-11.23%-3.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -27.89% return.


FLJP

1D
2.35%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
7.49%
6M
11.85%
1Y
33.62%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*

EZET

1D
2.14%
1M
5.11%
YTD
-27.89%
6M
-50.71%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLJP vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLJP vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJP
FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

EZET
EZET Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJP vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJPEZETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

0.16

+1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

0.79

+1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.09

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

0.28

+2.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.31

0.56

+8.75

FLJP vs. EZET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the EZET Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJP and EZET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLJPEZETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

0.16

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

-0.33

+0.74

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and EZET is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLJP vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, while EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
4.79%5.15%4.56%3.00%1.92%2.40%1.51%2.26%1.50%0.10%
EZET
Franklin Ethereum ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and EZET.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJPEZETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-64.05%

+31.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-61.68%

+48.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.59%

-55.80%

+48.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-30.49%

+21.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

30.61%

-27.11%

Volatility

FLJP vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is 8.84%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 19.05%. This indicates that FLJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLJPEZETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

19.05%

-10.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

53.59%

-39.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.28%

75.83%

-54.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

74.88%

-57.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

74.88%

-57.11%