PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJH vs. FLGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLJH vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLJH vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
9.29%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
-5.28%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than FLGR's -5.28% return.


FLJH

1D
2.72%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
9.29%
6M
17.51%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*

FLGR

1D
1.54%
1M
-6.28%
YTD
-5.28%
6M
-4.34%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLJH vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLJH and FLGR have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLJH vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJH vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJHFLGRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

0.50

+1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

0.86

+1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.11

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

0.73

+2.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

2.27

+10.07

FLJH vs. FLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the FLGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and FLGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLJHFLGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.50

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.33

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.25

+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between FLJH and FLGR is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLJH vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than FLGR's 1.82% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.57%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.82%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, smaller than the maximum FLGR drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and FLGR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJHFLGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.51%

-46.21%

+14.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-14.44%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-43.54%

+23.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-9.72%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-12.51%

+7.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

4.62%

-1.43%

Volatility

FLJH vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is 7.76%, while Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that FLJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLJHFLGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

8.23%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.50%

12.44%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.00%

20.18%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

20.10%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

21.43%

-1.53%