PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJH vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLJH vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLJH having a 20.31% return and DXJ slightly lower at 19.64%.


FLJH

1D
0.71%
1M
8.59%
YTD
20.31%
6M
18.71%
1Y
46.83%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
20.80%
10Y*

DXJ

1D
0.74%
1M
7.24%
YTD
19.64%
6M
24.36%
1Y
53.93%
3Y*
33.15%
5Y*
26.13%
10Y*
18.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJH vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
20.31%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
19.64%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%2.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJH and DXJ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.89

The correlation between FLJH and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLJH vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLJH
DXJ

Industrials

26.6%
27.4%

Technology

17.4%
12.9%

Financial Services

15.9%
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
15.6%

Communication Services

7.1%
2.7%

Healthcare

5.9%
6.8%

Basic Materials

4.3%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.7%

Real Estate

3.4%

-

Utilities

1.3%
0.1%

Energy

1.0%
1.7%

Industrials

FLJH
26.6%
DXJ
27.4%

Technology

FLJH
17.4%
DXJ
12.9%

Financial Services

FLJH
15.9%
DXJ
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FLJH
12.8%
DXJ
15.6%

Communication Services

FLJH
7.1%
DXJ
2.7%

Healthcare

FLJH
5.9%
DXJ
6.8%

Basic Materials

FLJH
4.3%
DXJ
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLJH
4.2%
DXJ
4.7%

Real Estate

FLJH
3.4%
DXJ

-

Utilities

FLJH
1.3%
DXJ
0.1%

Energy

FLJH
1.0%
DXJ
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLJH vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJH vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJHDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.56

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

4.94

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.09

19.29

-2.20

FLJH vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLJHDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

3.11

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

1.39

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.43

+0.32

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJHDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.51%

-49.63%

+18.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.80%

-10.98%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-22.19%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-22.19%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-14.34%

+9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.81%

-0.06%

Volatility

FLJH vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLJHDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.55%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

13.09%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.98%

17.44%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

18.96%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

20.18%

-0.36%

FLJH vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLJH vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than DXJ's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
1.08%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.24%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLJH and DXJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DXJ has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to FLJH (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJH dropped -31.51% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 5-year performance, DXJ leads with 26.13% vs 20.80% for FLJH. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 26.13% return vs 20.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.08% for DXJ.

FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJH and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLJH and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer