FLJH vs. DIEM
FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) and DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index, while DIEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJH returned 20.82%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for DIEM. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLJH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DIEM.
Performance
FLJH vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 20.52% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 29.14% return.
FLJH
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 6M
- 21.03%
- 1Y
- 47.18%
- 3Y*
- 27.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.82%
- 10Y*
- —
DIEM
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 29.14%
- 6M
- 29.82%
- 1Y
- 48.92%
- 3Y*
- 27.02%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
FLJH vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 20.52% | 25.26% | 25.89% | 36.02% | -2.75% | 12.68% | 10.65% | 20.34% | -14.66% | 1.26% |
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 29.14% | 30.81% | 12.29% | 15.41% | -20.61% | 6.92% | 1.27% | 12.23% | -11.29% | 3.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJH and DIEM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.51 |
The correlation between FLJH and DIEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLJH vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank
FLJH
DIEM
FLJH vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLJH | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.39 | 3.99 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.90 | 15.36 | +1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLJH vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and DIEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJH | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.51% | -38.61% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -12.33% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.39% | -16.82% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -33.34% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -5.49% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -9.68% | +4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 3.19% | -0.39% |
Volatility
FLJH vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is 7.13%, while Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a volatility of 12.23%. This indicates that FLJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLJH | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 12.23% | -5.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.64% | 19.23% | -4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 20.99% | -2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 17.58% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 17.91% | +1.97% |
FLJH vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLJH vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison
FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than DIEM's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 1.64% | 2.99% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 6.31% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 5.98% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 0.35% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 1.85% | 3.90% | 5.06% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLJH and DIEM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIEM has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to FLJH (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJH dropped -31.51% vs DIEM's -38.61%.
On 5-year performance, FLJH leads with 20.82% vs 11.36% for DIEM. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 7.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 20.82% return vs 11.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DIEM.
FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.64% for DIEM.
FLJH is categorized as Japan Equities, while DIEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index, while DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJH and 0.19% for DIEM.
FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLJH and DIEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer