FLJH vs. DFIV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV).

FLJH and DFIV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLJH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. DFIV is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Apr 16, 1999.

Performance

FLJH vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLJH vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	6.40%	25.26%	25.89%	36.02%	-2.75%	-4.28%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	5.98%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 5.98% return.

FLJH

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: -7.04%
• YTD: 6.40%
• 6M: 13.61%
• 1Y: 35.61%
• 3Y*: 27.63%
• 5Y*: 17.84%
• 10Y*: —

DFIV

• 1D: 2.74%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: 5.98%
• 6M: 15.53%
• 1Y: 38.38%
• 3Y*: 22.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJH vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

DFIV

Dimensional International Value ETF

FLJH

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

FLJH vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJH

FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 89

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 94
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJH vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLJH	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	2.25	-0.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.94	-0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.46	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	3.08	-0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.73	13.72	-2.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLJH vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and DFIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLJH	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	2.25	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.89	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between FLJH and DFIV is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FLJH vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than DFIV's 2.69% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	3.67%	3.90%	5.06%	25.59%	26.67%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	0.10%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.69%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJH	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.51%	-25.42%	-6.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.83%	-12.12%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.52%	-5.95%	-1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-4.58%	-0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	2.72%	+0.51%

Volatility

FLJH vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a higher volatility of 8.09% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 6.81%. This indicates that FLJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJH	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.09%	6.81%	+1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.31%	10.46%	+3.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.87%	17.16%	+5.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.47%	16.71%	+1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.88%	16.71%	+3.17%