PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLIIX vs. MLPOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLIIX vs. MLPOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIIX achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than MLPOX's 21.85% return.


FLIIX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.85%
6M
6.63%
YTD
11.47%
1Y
6.81%
3Y*
8.67%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.45%

MLPOX

1D
0.19%
1M
3.43%
6M
14.95%
YTD
21.85%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
23.74%
10Y*
9.35%
ALL TIME*
7.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLIIX vs. MLPOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLIIX
First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
11.47%9.16%5.55%3.21%-4.06%12.94%-0.16%31.02%-6.06%11.43%
MLPOX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund
21.85%4.47%40.63%20.44%29.45%39.81%-30.40%6.71%-14.77%-9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIIX and MLPOX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017

0.47

The correlation between FLIIX and MLPOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLIIX vs. MLPOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLIIX
FLIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FLIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPOX
MLPOX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MLPOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLIIX vs. MLPOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLIIXMLPOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.34

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

3.90

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

9.38

-6.96

FLIIX vs. MLPOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the MLPOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIIX and MLPOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLIIX vs. MLPOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIIX drawdown since its inception was -35.85%, smaller than the maximum MLPOX drawdown of -76.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIIX and MLPOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLIIXMLPOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.85%

-76.99%

+41.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-5.93%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.71%

-15.18%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-21.17%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-1.47%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-16.29%

+11.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.46%

+0.64%

Volatility

FLIIX vs. MLPOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) is 2.89%, while Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that FLIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLIIXMLPOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

3.90%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

9.22%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

11.73%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

19.05%

-4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

25.96%

-10.36%

FLIIX vs. MLPOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPOX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLIIX vs. MLPOX - Dividend Comparison

FLIIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLIIX
First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
0.00%0.00%5.37%2.46%4.79%6.31%5.71%6.32%4.13%6.91%0.00%0.00%
MLPOX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund
4.75%5.31%4.26%5.55%6.19%7.52%13.39%10.42%10.08%8.00%7.18%7.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLIIX and MLPOX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPOX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to FLIIX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIIX dropped -35.85% vs MLPOX's -76.99%.

MLPOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLIIX and MLPOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer