PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGB vs. IWF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLGB vs. IWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLGB vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
4.65%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-11.60%1.12%
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
-9.05%18.33%33.12%42.59%-29.31%27.43%38.25%35.86%-1.67%3.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGB achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's -9.05% return.


FLGB

1D
1.61%
1M
-3.89%
YTD
4.65%
6M
10.11%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
18.04%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*

IWF

1D
0.87%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
-9.05%
6M
-8.54%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
16.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLGB vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLGB vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IWF
IWF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGB vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLGBIWFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

0.84

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

1.35

+0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.19

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.20

+1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.37

4.08

+6.29

FLGB vs. IWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the IWF Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGB and IWF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLGBIWFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

0.84

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.58

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.37

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between FLGB and IWF is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLGB vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison

FLGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than IWF's 0.39% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
3.34%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%0.00%0.00%
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.39%0.36%0.46%0.67%0.91%0.49%0.66%0.99%1.27%1.10%1.43%1.37%

Drawdowns

FLGB vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGB drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGB and IWF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGBIWFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

-64.25%

+21.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-16.27%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-32.72%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.13%

-12.36%

+7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-22.21%

+15.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

4.80%

-2.11%

Volatility

FLGB vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) have volatilities of 6.64% and 6.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLGBIWFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

6.82%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

12.39%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

22.41%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

21.41%

-4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

20.92%

-1.94%