FLGB vs. FLCH
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).
FLGB and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLGB is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both FLGB and FLCH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLGB vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLGB vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF | 4.65% | 33.73% | 8.77% | 14.33% | -6.00% | 17.14% | -9.47% | 23.23% | -11.60% | 1.12% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -5.65% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLGB achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -5.65% return.
FLGB
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -12.56%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- -4.85%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLGB vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLGB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLGB vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
FLGB
FLCH
FLGB vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLGB | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 0.32 | +1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 0.59 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.08 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 0.45 | +1.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 1.29 | +9.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLGB | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 0.32 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | -0.16 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.02 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLGB and FLCH is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLGB vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
FLGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than FLCH's 2.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF | 3.34% | 3.50% | 4.42% | 3.95% | 4.23% | 2.93% | 2.67% | 4.30% | 3.92% | 0.43% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.50% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
FLGB vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLGB drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGB and FLCH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLGB | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -62.09% | +19.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.86% | -16.65% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -56.06% | +30.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -33.49% | +28.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -30.50% | +23.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 6.02% | -3.33% |
Volatility
FLGB vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) have volatilities of 6.64% and 6.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLGB | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 6.44% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 13.92% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.88% | 23.03% | -6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 29.58% | -13.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 28.06% | -9.08% |