PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLG vs. IPKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLG vs. IPKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) and Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLG achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly higher than IPKW's 6.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FLG has underperformed IPKW with an annualized return of -7.19%, while IPKW has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.


FLG

1D
-2.27%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
9.46%
6M
8.25%
1Y
20.02%
3Y*
-23.52%
5Y*
-14.47%
10Y*
-7.19%

IPKW

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.86%
YTD
6.08%
6M
9.96%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLG vs. IPKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLG
Flagstar Financial, Inc.
9.46%35.39%-69.13%26.87%-24.54%22.67%-5.82%35.38%-23.24%-13.88%
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
6.08%45.50%10.56%15.12%-12.81%11.41%16.18%20.26%-21.59%34.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FLG and IPKW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2014

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLG vs. IPKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLG
FLG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IPKW
IPKW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IPKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPKW Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IPKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPKW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLG vs. IPKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) and Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLGIPKWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.33

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

2.87

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

9.91

-7.27

FLG vs. IPKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the IPKW Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLG and IPKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLGIPKWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.84

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.54

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.64

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.60

-0.34

Drawdowns

FLG vs. IPKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLG drawdown since its inception was -80.11%, which is greater than IPKW's maximum drawdown of -47.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLG and IPKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGIPKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.11%

-47.24%

-32.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.47%

-9.14%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.11%

-17.77%

-62.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.11%

-33.18%

-46.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.11%

-47.24%

-32.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.24%

-2.45%

-62.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.10%

-9.00%

-17.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.60%

2.64%

+4.96%

Volatility

FLG vs. IPKW - Volatility Comparison

Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) at 4.37%. This indicates that FLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGIPKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

4.37%

+3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.41%

11.86%

+8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.97%

14.31%

+17.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.66%

17.01%

+36.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.73%

17.91%

+25.82%

Dividends

FLG vs. IPKW - Dividend Comparison

FLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than IPKW's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLG
Flagstar Financial, Inc.
0.29%0.32%2.14%6.65%7.91%5.57%6.45%5.66%7.23%5.22%4.27%6.13%
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.52%3.55%4.12%2.66%3.77%7.37%1.45%2.41%2.61%0.93%2.82%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLG and IPKW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLG has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to IPKW (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLG dropped -80.11% vs IPKW's -47.24%.

IPKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLG and IPKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer