FLFGX vs. FLDGX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FLFGX (Meeder Global Allocation Fund) and FLDGX (Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - FLFGX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Meeder Funds, while FLDGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Meeder Funds. Over the past 10 years, FLFGX returned 10.12%/yr vs 13.55%/yr for FLDGX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FLFGX charges 1.81%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for FLDGX.

Performance

FLFGX vs. FLDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) and Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLFGX having a 10.53% return and FLDGX slightly lower at 10.04%. Over the past 10 years, FLFGX has underperformed FLDGX with an annualized return of 10.12%, while FLDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.55% annualized return.

FLFGX

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 10.53%
• 6M: 9.42%
• 1Y: 21.46%
• 3Y*: 20.23%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: 10.12%

FLDGX

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 6M: 8.81%
• 1Y: 22.37%
• 3Y*: 22.96%
• 5Y*: 12.92%
• 10Y*: 13.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLFGX vs. FLDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLFGX Meeder Global Allocation Fund	10.53%	18.82%	22.53%	15.37%	-12.93%	12.57%	2.99%	13.17%	-6.93%	22.34%
FLDGX Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund	10.04%	17.24%	30.96%	20.70%	-15.46%	19.51%	15.41%	24.00%	-8.65%	21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FLFGX and FLDGX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2006	0.95

The correlation between FLFGX and FLDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLFGX vs. FLDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLFGX

FLFGX Risk / Return Rank: 52
FLFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FLFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FLFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FLFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FLFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FLDGX

FLDGX Risk / Return Rank: 54
FLDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FLDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FLDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FLDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FLDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLFGX vs. FLDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) and Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLFGX	FLDGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.89	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.65	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.34	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	2.61	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.22	11.69	-0.47

FLFGX vs. FLDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FLDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLFGX and FLDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLFGX vs. FLDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLFGX drawdown since its inception was -60.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FLDGX drawdown of -58.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLFGX and FLDGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLFGX	FLDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.31%	-58.72%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-9.17%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.63%	-16.64%	+2.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.54%	-33.96%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.54%	-33.96%	+5.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-2.07%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.44%	-16.80%	+5.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.04%	+0.02%

Volatility

FLFGX vs. FLDGX - Volatility Comparison

Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) at 4.93%. This indicates that FLFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLFGX	FLDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	4.93%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	10.26%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.75%	12.67%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.34%	19.02%	-3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	18.51%	-4.65%

FLFGX vs. FLDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLFGX has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDGX's 1.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLFGX vs. FLDGX - Dividend Comparison

FLFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.81%, more than FLDGX's 6.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLDGX Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund	6.86%	7.53%	29.01%	0.99%	3.71%	14.92%	2.21%	2.21%	1.30%	8.48%	1.44%	3.39%
FLFGX Meeder Global Allocation Fund	12.81%	14.35%	25.20%	1.64%	0.77%	11.13%	2.22%	2.12%	5.05%	1.41%	1.14%	3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLFGX and FLDGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FLFGX and FLDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLFGX or FLDGX?

FLFGX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to FLDGX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLFGX dropped -60.31% vs FLDGX's -58.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.