FLEH vs. FLCH
FLEH (Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLEH is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLEH returned 11.81%/yr vs -4.93%/yr for FLCH. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLEH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.
Performance
FLEH vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLEH achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -6.30% return.
FLEH
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- -4.93%
- 10Y*
- —
FLEH vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF | 6.27% | 41.56% | 2.26% | 16.21% | -9.14% | 23.27% | 0.95% | 26.94% | -8.54% | -1.24% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -6.30% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLEH and FLCH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.44 |
FLEH vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLEH
FLCH
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FLEH
FLCH
Industrials
FLEH
FLCH
Healthcare
FLEH
FLCH
Consumer Defensive
FLEH
FLCH
Consumer Cyclical
FLEH
FLCH
Technology
FLEH
FLCH
Basic Materials
FLEH
FLCH
Energy
FLEH
FLCH
Utilities
FLEH
FLCH
Communication Services
FLEH
FLCH
Real Estate
FLEH
FLCH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLEH vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
FLEH
FLCH
FLEH vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLEH | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.09 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.54 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 1.14 | +3.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLEH | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.44 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | -0.17 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.02 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
FLEH vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLEH drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEH and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLEH | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -62.09% | +28.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -15.52% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.67% | -25.43% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -55.78% | +37.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -33.95% | +32.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -30.53% | +25.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 7.38% | -3.70% |
Volatility
FLEH vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLEH | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 6.59% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 13.67% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 19.22% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 29.59% | -13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 27.91% | -9.66% |
FLEH vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLEH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLEH vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
FLEH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than FLCH's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.52% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF | 2.09% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.25% | 21.45% | 3.03% | 1.94% | 6.06% | 12.17% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLEH and FLCH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLEH has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to FLCH (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEH dropped -33.94% vs FLCH's -62.09%.
On 5-year performance, FLEH leads with 11.81% vs -4.93% for FLCH. On fees, FLEH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLEH has performed better with a 11.81% return vs -4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLEH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.
FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 2.09% for FLEH.
FLEH is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. FLEH tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEH and 0.19% for FLCH.
FLEH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLEH and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer