PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLEH vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLEH vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEH achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 5.18% return.


FLEH

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.88%
YTD
6.27%
6M
9.17%
1Y
18.35%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*

FEZ

1D
-1.26%
1M
5.21%
YTD
5.18%
6M
6.87%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLEH vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLEH
Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF
6.27%41.56%2.26%16.21%-9.14%23.27%0.95%26.94%-8.54%-1.24%
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
5.18%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%-1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEH and FEZ is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.82

The correlation between FLEH and FEZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLEH vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLEH
FEZ

Financial Services

16.0%
23.4%

Industrials

15.3%
20.1%

Healthcare

14.8%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

12.1%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
8.6%

Technology

7.5%
17.9%

Basic Materials

6.8%
3.5%

Energy

5.5%
5.0%

Utilities

4.0%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.4%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Financial Services

FLEH
16.0%
FEZ
23.4%

Industrials

FLEH
15.3%
FEZ
20.1%

Healthcare

FLEH
14.8%
FEZ
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLEH
12.1%
FEZ
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLEH
10.8%
FEZ
8.6%

Technology

FLEH
7.5%
FEZ
17.9%

Basic Materials

FLEH
6.8%
FEZ
3.5%

Energy

FLEH
5.5%
FEZ
5.0%

Utilities

FLEH
4.0%
FEZ
4.6%

Communication Services

FLEH
3.4%
FEZ
3.5%

Real Estate

FLEH
1.3%
FEZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLEH vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEH
FLEH Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FLEH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEH Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEH Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLEH vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLEHFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.25

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

4.25

+0.74

FLEH vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEH Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEH and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLEHFEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

0.95

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.48

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.30

+0.27

Drawdowns

FLEH vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEH drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEH and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLEHFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-64.21%

+30.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-13.63%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-15.85%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-35.05%

+16.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-2.33%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-17.07%

+12.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

3.99%

-0.31%

Volatility

FLEH vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLEHFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

6.72%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

14.85%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

17.91%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

20.61%

-4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

21.11%

-2.86%

FLEH vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLEH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLEH vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

FLEH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than FEZ's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.57%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
FLEH
Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF
2.09%2.22%3.18%3.25%21.45%3.03%1.94%6.06%12.17%0.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FLEH and FEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLEH has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to FEZ (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEH dropped -33.94% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

On 5-year performance, FLEH leads with 11.81% vs 9.90% for FEZ. On fees, FLEH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLEH has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.

FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.09% for FLEH.

FLEH tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEH and 0.29% for FEZ.

FLEH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLEH and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer