FLEE vs. FEZ
FLEE (Franklin FTSE Europe ETF) and FEZ (SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FLEE tracks the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index while FEZ tracks the EURO STOXX 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLEE returned 8.65%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for FEZ. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLEE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FEZ.
Performance
FLEE vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLEE achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 5.18% return.
FLEE
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 17.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- —
FEZ
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 5.18%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 16.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
FLEE vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEE Franklin FTSE Europe ETF | 5.58% | 35.76% | 2.03% | 20.46% | -15.22% | 16.84% | 5.33% | 24.41% | -14.97% | 1.47% |
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 5.18% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | -1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLEE and FEZ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FLEE and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLEE vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLEE
FEZ
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FLEE
FEZ
Industrials
FLEE
FEZ
Healthcare
FLEE
FEZ
Consumer Defensive
FLEE
FEZ
Technology
FLEE
FEZ
Consumer Cyclical
FLEE
FEZ
Basic Materials
FLEE
FEZ
Energy
FLEE
FEZ
Utilities
FLEE
FEZ
Communication Services
FLEE
FEZ
Real Estate
FLEE
FEZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLEE vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank
FLEE
FEZ
FLEE vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLEE | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.17 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.25 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 4.25 | +0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLEE | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.95 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.48 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.30 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
FLEE vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLEE drawdown since its inception was -37.27%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEE and FEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLEE | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.27% | -64.21% | +26.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.37% | -13.63% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.59% | -15.85% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.62% | -35.05% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -2.33% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.11% | -17.07% | +9.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.99% | -0.61% |
Volatility
FLEE vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) is 5.78%, while SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that FLEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLEE | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 6.72% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 14.85% | -1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 17.91% | -2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 20.61% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 21.11% | -2.16% |
FLEE vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLEE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLEE vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison
FLEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than FEZ's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.57% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
FLEE Franklin FTSE Europe ETF | 2.61% | 2.76% | 3.93% | 2.57% | 3.48% | 3.61% | 1.88% | 3.02% | 3.85% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FLEE and FEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FEZ has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to FLEE (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEE dropped -37.27% vs FEZ's -64.21%.
On 5-year performance, FEZ leads with 9.90% vs 8.65% for FLEE. On fees, FLEE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEE has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLEE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.
FLEE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.57% for FEZ.
FLEE tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEE and 0.29% for FEZ.
FLEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLEE and FEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer