FLDR vs. SCHZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ).
FLDR and SCHZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLDR is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2018. SCHZ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate. It was launched on Jul 14, 2011. Both FLDR and SCHZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLDR or SCHZ.
Performance
FLDR vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCHZ's 3.44% return.
FLDR
5.13%
0.20%
2.91%
6.48%
2.61%
N/A
SCHZ
3.44%
-2.00%
3.76%
8.83%
1.48%
2.85%
Key characteristics
| FLDR | SCHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 6.62 | 1.58 |
| Sortino Ratio | 13.27 | 2.36 |
| Omega Ratio | 2.74 | 1.28 |
| Calmar Ratio | 24.59 | 0.84 |
| Martin Ratio | 100.66 | 6.22 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.07% | 1.52% |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.00% | 5.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.23% | -16.93% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.01% | -3.46% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLDR vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between FLDR and SCHZ is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLDR vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLDR vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, less than SCHZ's 5.85% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 5.58% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 5.85% | 3.85% | 3.73% | 3.61% | 4.05% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.81% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 3.06% | 3.06% |
Drawdowns
FLDR vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum SCHZ drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and SCHZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLDR vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.29%, while Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.