FLDR vs. SCCR
FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) and SCCR (Schwab Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLDR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index, while SCCR is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. FLDR is passively managed, while SCCR is actively managed. Over the past year, FLDR returned 4.76% vs 6.10% for SCCR. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLDR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for SCCR.
Performance
FLDR vs. SCCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly higher than SCCR's 0.32% return.
FLDR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- —
SCCR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLDR vs. SCCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.44% | 4.77% |
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF | 0.32% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDR and SCCR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FLDR and SCCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLDR vs. SCCR — Risk / Return Rank
FLDR
SCCR
FLDR vs. SCCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDR | SCCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.75 | 1.29 | +1.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.24 | 2.18 | +8.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 70.25 | 6.58 | +63.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDR | SCCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.95 | 1.63 | +4.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.20 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
FLDR vs. SCCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, which is greater than SCCR's maximum drawdown of -2.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and SCCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDR | SCCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -2.81% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.47% | -2.81% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -1.56% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -0.76% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 0.93% | -0.86% |
Volatility
FLDR vs. SCCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.19%, while Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLDR | SCCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | 1.28% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.58% | 2.70% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80% | 3.75% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.21% | 4.38% | -3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 4.38% | +0.88% |
FLDR vs. SCCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SCCR's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLDR vs. SCCR - Dividend Comparison
FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than SCCR's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.43% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% |
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF | 4.63% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLDR and SCCR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCCR has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDR dropped -12.23% vs SCCR's -2.81%.
On 1-year performance, SCCR leads with 6.10% vs 4.76% for FLDR. On fees, FLDR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCCR has performed better with a 6.10% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLDR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for SCCR.
SCCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 4.43% for FLDR.
FLDR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCCR is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLDR and 0.16% for SCCR.
FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.95 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLDR and SCCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer