FLDR vs. SCCR
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR).
FLDR and SCCR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLDR is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2018. SCCR is an actively managed fund by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Feb 4, 2025.
Performance
FLDR vs. SCCR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLDR vs. SCCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 0.65% | 4.77% |
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF | 0.25% | 6.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than SCCR's 0.25% return.
FLDR
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- —
SCCR
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLDR vs. SCCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SCCR's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLDR vs. SCCR — Risk / Return Rank
FLDR
SCCR
FLDR vs. SCCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDR | SCCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.59 | 1.23 | +3.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.89 | 1.76 | +5.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.22 | 1.22 | +1.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.98 | 2.03 | +3.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.24 | 5.61 | +25.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDR | SCCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59 | 1.23 | +3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.35 | -0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDR and SCCR is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLDR vs. SCCR - Dividend Comparison
FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than SCCR's 4.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.54% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% |
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF | 4.69% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLDR vs. SCCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, which is greater than SCCR's maximum drawdown of -2.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and SCCR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDR | SCCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -2.67% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.76% | -2.67% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -1.63% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -0.63% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.14% | 0.96% | -0.82% |
Volatility
FLDR vs. SCCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.42%, while Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLDR | SCCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 1.69% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.56% | 2.52% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98% | 4.35% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.21% | 4.46% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 4.46% | +0.86% |