PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLDR vs. FELG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLDR vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLDR vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
0.65%5.41%5.71%1.31%
FELG
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
-10.02%18.44%35.45%4.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than FELG's -10.02% return.


FLDR

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.86%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*

FELG

1D
3.91%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-10.02%
6M
-8.66%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLDR vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLDR vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FELG
FELG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDR vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLDRFELGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.59

0.87

+3.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.89

1.40

+5.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.22

1.20

+1.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.98

1.22

+4.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

31.24

4.23

+27.01

FLDR vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDR Sharpe Ratio is 4.59, which is higher than the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDR and FELG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLDRFELGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.59

0.87

+3.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.94

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between FLDR and FELG is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLDR vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than FELG's 0.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.54%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%
FELG
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
0.41%0.38%0.44%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLDR vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum FELG drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and FELG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLDRFELGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-23.89%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-16.17%

+15.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-12.90%

+12.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-3.56%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.14%

4.67%

-4.53%

Volatility

FLDR vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.42%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLDRFELGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

6.85%

-6.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.56%

12.41%

-11.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98%

22.58%

-21.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.21%

20.24%

-19.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.32%

20.24%

-14.92%