PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLDB vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLDB vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLDB vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLDB
Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF
0.82%4.93%4.29%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.12%7.57%3.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDB achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.12% return.


FLDB

1D
0.02%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBND

1D
-0.02%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLDB vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLDB vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDB
FLDB Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDB vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLDBFBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.35

1.03

+3.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.43

1.44

+5.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.05

1.18

+0.87

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.81

1.69

+10.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

67.36

5.25

+62.10

FLDB vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDB Sharpe Ratio is 4.35, which is higher than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDB and FBND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLDBFBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35

1.03

+3.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.62

0.44

+3.18

Correlation

The correlation between FLDB and FBND is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLDB vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FLDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than FBND's 4.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLDB
Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF
4.55%4.72%3.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.73%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%

Drawdowns

FLDB vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDB drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDB and FBND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLDBFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-17.25%

+16.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.40%

-2.79%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.80%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-3.38%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.90%

-0.83%

Volatility

FLDB vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) is 0.28%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that FLDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLDBFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

1.66%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.68%

2.62%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05%

4.44%

-3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.33%

5.90%

-4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.33%

6.08%

-4.75%