PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCO vs. VCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCO vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCO achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 0.79% return.


FLCO

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.66%
6M
-1.11%
YTD
-0.84%
1Y
1.48%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.98%

VCSH

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.22%
6M
0.39%
YTD
0.79%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
2.64%
ALL TIME*
2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.90M$1.79M$1.34M
$304.83M$291.45M$343.43M

FLCO vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCO
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF
-0.84%7.53%1.93%7.94%-16.08%-2.06%10.01%14.82%-3.06%5.98%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.79%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%7.02%0.92%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCO and VCSH is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2016

0.74

The correlation between FLCO and VCSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCO vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLCO
FLCO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLCO vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCOVCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.36

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

2.61

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

10.26

-8.10

FLCO vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCO and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCO vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCO drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, which is greater than VCSH's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCO and VCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCOVCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.71%

-12.86%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-1.40%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.36%

-1.40%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.48%

-9.48%

-13.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.58%

-0.29%

-3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-0.96%

-4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.36%

+0.68%

Volatility

FLCO vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.55%. This indicates that FLCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCOVCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

0.55%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.43%

1.56%

+1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

1.94%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

2.90%

+4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.80%

3.35%

+3.45%

FLCO vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCO vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

FLCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than VCSH's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCO
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF
4.32%4.60%4.63%3.83%3.85%2.85%3.99%3.39%3.86%3.33%0.51%0.00%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.08%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCO and VCSH have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCO has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to VCSH (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCO dropped -22.71% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

On 5-year performance, VCSH leads with 2.30% vs -0.59% for FLCO. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VCSH has performed better with a 2.30% return vs -0.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLCO.

FLCO has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 4.08% for VCSH.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLCO and 0.04% for VCSH.

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCO and VCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer