FLCO vs. BSCQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLCO (Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. FLCO is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCO returned 0.21%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for BSCQ. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.

Performance

FLCO vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCO achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.55% return.

FLCO

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: 0.59%
• 1Y: 5.18%
• 3Y*: 5.11%
• 5Y*: 0.21%
• 10Y*: —

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 5.05%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCO vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF	0.59%	7.53%	1.93%	7.94%	-16.08%	-2.06%	10.01%	14.82%	-3.06%	5.98%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.55%	5.02%	4.86%	5.71%	-8.31%	-1.68%	9.41%	13.94%	-2.40%	5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCO and BSCQ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2016	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FLCO and BSCQ has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLCO vs. BSCQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCO	BSCQ
Financial Services	12.6%	32.7%
Healthcare	2.8%	7.4%
Communication Services	2.4%	1.5%
Industrials	2.1%	6.0%
Energy	1.7%	3.0%
Technology	1.1%	10.8%
Basic Materials	0.5%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	6.1%
Real Estate	-	2.9%
Utilities	-	3.5%

Return for Risk

FLCO vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCO

FLCO Risk / Return Rank: 35
FLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCO vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCO	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	7.01	-5.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	15.13	-13.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	3.43	-2.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	42.97	-41.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.66	178.56	-172.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCO vs. BSCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the BSCQ Sharpe Ratio of 7.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCO and BSCQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCO	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	7.01	-5.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.45	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.60	-0.29

Drawdowns

FLCO vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCO drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCO and BSCQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCO	BSCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.71%	-16.50%	-6.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-0.10%	-2.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.59%	-1.13%	-5.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.48%	-13.02%	-9.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	0.00%	-2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-2.85%	-3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.02%	+0.90%

Volatility

FLCO vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.17%. This indicates that FLCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCO	BSCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	0.17%	+1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.25%	0.43%	+2.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.43%	0.63%	+3.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.14%	3.30%	+3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.83%	4.77%	+2.06%

FLCO vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCO vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

FLCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF	4.65%	4.60%	4.63%	3.83%	3.85%	2.85%	3.99%	3.39%	3.86%	3.33%	0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCO and BSCQ in my portfolio?

FLCO and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCO or BSCQ?

FLCO has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCO dropped -22.71% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.

Which ETF is better, FLCO or BSCQ?

On 5-year performance, BSCQ leads with 1.47% vs 0.21% for FLCO. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCO or BSCQ?

Over the 5-year period, BSCQ has performed better with a 1.47% return vs 0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCO or BSCQ?

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCO or BSCQ?

FLCO has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 4.12% for BSCQ.

What is the main difference between FLCO and BSCQ?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLCO and 0.10% for BSCQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.01 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.