FLCO vs. BBCB
FLCO (Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF) and BBCB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. FLCO is actively managed, while BBCB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCO returned 0.21%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for BBCB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBCB.
Performance
FLCO vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCO achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than BBCB's 2.94% return.
FLCO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- —
BBCB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 2.91%
- 1Y
- 7.89%
- 3Y*
- 6.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCO vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 0.59% | 7.53% | 1.93% | 7.94% | -16.08% | -2.06% | 10.01% | 14.82% | 0.19% |
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 2.94% | 7.69% | 1.97% | 8.42% | -15.72% | -2.23% | 10.39% | 14.86% | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCO and BBCB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FLCO and BBCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLCO vs. BBCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCO
BBCB
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FLCO
BBCB
Healthcare
FLCO
BBCB
Communication Services
FLCO
BBCB
Industrials
FLCO
BBCB
Energy
FLCO
BBCB
Technology
FLCO
BBCB
Basic Materials
FLCO
BBCB
Consumer Defensive
FLCO
BBCB
Consumer Cyclical
FLCO
BBCB
Real Estate
FLCO
-
BBCB
Utilities
FLCO
-
BBCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCO vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank
FLCO
BBCB
FLCO vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCO | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 2.69 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 9.52 | -3.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCO | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.62 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.12 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.46 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
FLCO vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCO drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, roughly equal to the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCO and BBCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCO | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.71% | -22.48% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -2.95% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.59% | -6.46% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.48% | -22.32% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -0.23% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -6.66% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.83% | +0.09% |
Volatility
FLCO vs. BBCB - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) have volatilities of 1.42% and 1.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCO | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.40% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.25% | 3.98% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.43% | 4.93% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 7.25% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 7.49% | -0.66% |
FLCO vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLCO vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison
FLCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, less than BBCB's 7.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 7.14% | 5.02% | 5.22% | 4.22% | 3.39% | 3.47% | 4.59% | 5.25% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 4.65% | 4.60% | 4.63% | 3.83% | 3.85% | 2.85% | 3.99% | 3.39% | 3.86% | 3.33% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FLCO and BBCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FLCO has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to BBCB (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCO dropped -22.71% vs BBCB's -22.48%.
On 5-year performance, BBCB leads with 0.86% vs 0.21% for FLCO. On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBCB has performed better with a 0.86% return vs 0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLCO.
BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 4.65% for FLCO.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLCO and 0.09% for BBCB.
BBCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCO and BBCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer