FLCH vs. WEBN.DE
FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and WEBN.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while WEBN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLCH returned 1.96% vs 27.53% for WEBN.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WEBN.DE.
Performance
FLCH vs. WEBN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLCH is traded in USD, while WEBN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WEBN.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than WEBN.DE's 11.06% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- -9.10%
- 1Y
- 1.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.03%
- 5Y*
- -5.07%
- 10Y*
- —
WEBN.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH vs. WEBN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -8.28% | 32.55% | 11.69% |
WEBN.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 11.06% | 23.85% | 5.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and WEBN.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. WEBN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
WEBN.DE
FLCH vs. WEBN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLCH | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.42 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 3.21 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 13.58 | -13.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. WEBN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than WEBN.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and WEBN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -17.41% | -44.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.14% | -8.99% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.34% | -0.82% | -34.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.53% | -1.85% | -28.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 2.13% | +5.74% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. WEBN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) at 3.44%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 3.44% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.73% | 9.10% | +4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.26% | 12.16% | +7.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 14.83% | +14.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.88% | 14.83% | +13.05% |
FLCH vs. WEBN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBN.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLCH vs. WEBN.DE - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while WEBN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.57% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
WEBN.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCH and WEBN.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WEBN.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBN.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.
FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while WEBN.DE is Global Equities. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while WEBN.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.07% for WEBN.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLCH and WEBN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer