FLCH vs. VTV

Last updated Jul 26, 2026

FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCH returned -3.87%/yr vs 12.51%/yr for VTV. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLCH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

FLCH vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -10.17% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.94% return.

FLCH

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 4.49%
• 6M: -13.97%
• YTD: -10.17%
• 1Y: -6.50%
• 3Y*: 7.74%
• 5Y*: -3.87%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.09%

VTV

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: 13.03%
• YTD: 16.94%
• 1Y: 24.90%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 12.48%
• ALL TIME*: 9.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	$3.91M	$4.48M	$3.36M
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	$654.06M	$690.11M	$596.84M

FLCH vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-10.17%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	1.51%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	16.94%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	26.53%	2.33%	25.66%	-5.47%	4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and VTV is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.41

The correlation between FLCH and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLCH vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCH	VTV
Consumer Cyclical	23.2%	3.9%
Financial Services	19.0%	22.4%
Communication Services	16.2%	2.9%
Technology	10.5%	15.3%
Industrials	8.2%	14.3%
Healthcare	6.1%	15.2%
Basic Materials	5.6%	3.0%
Energy	3.4%	6.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	8.7%
Utilities	2.0%	4.8%
Real Estate	1.6%	2.5%

Return for Risk

FLCH vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 8
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 8

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 92
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 92
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCH	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	2.49	-2.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.36	3.60	-3.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.45	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	4.02	-4.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.68	15.23	-15.91

FLCH vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCH	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.09%	-59.27%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.48%	-6.35%	-15.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-14.52%	-10.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.38%	-17.04%	-33.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.68%	0.00%	-36.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.62%	-7.82%	-22.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.01%	1.67%	+8.34%

Volatility

FLCH vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.48%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCH	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.99%	2.48%	+3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.93%	7.59%	+6.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.83%	10.28%	+9.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.58%	13.81%	+15.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.80%	16.61%	+11.19%

FLCH vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLCH vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than VTV's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.41%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.85%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCH and VTV in my portfolio?

FLCH and VTV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCH or VTV?

FLCH has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to VTV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, FLCH or VTV?

On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 12.51% vs -3.87% for FLCH. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCH or VTV?

Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.51% return vs -3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCH or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCH or VTV?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.85% for VTV.

What is the main difference between FLCH and VTV?

FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.04% for VTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.