FLCH vs. LINE
FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while LINE (Lineage, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, FLCH returned 2.19% vs 0.00% for LINE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLCH vs. LINE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than LINE's 22.88% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- 1Y
- 2.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -5.25%
- 10Y*
- —
LINE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 22.88%
- 6M
- 25.85%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH vs. LINE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -9.50% | 32.55% | 16.60% |
LINE Lineage, Inc. | 22.88% | -37.20% | -26.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and LINE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. LINE — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
LINE
FLCH vs. LINE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Lineage, Inc. (LINE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCH | LINE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.03 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.00 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | 0.00 | +0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCH | LINE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 0.00 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -0.72 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. LINE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, roughly equal to the maximum LINE drawdown of -61.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and LINE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | LINE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -61.74% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.14% | -28.46% | +11.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.20% | -48.26% | +12.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.54% | -41.04% | +10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.58% | 15.15% | -7.57% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. LINE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 6.46%, while Lineage, Inc. (LINE) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LINE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | LINE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 10.08% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 28.96% | -15.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.31% | 37.61% | -18.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.61% | 36.70% | -7.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.91% | 36.70% | -8.79% |
Dividends
FLCH vs. LINE - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than LINE's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.61% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
LINE Lineage, Inc. | 5.00% | 6.03% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCH and LINE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LINE has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to FLCH (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs LINE's -61.74%.
FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCH and LINE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer