FLCH vs. EZBC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while EZBC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLCH returned 8.36% vs -38.68% for EZBC. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

FLCH vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -25.36% return.

FLCH

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: -6.30%
• 6M: -7.45%
• 1Y: 8.36%
• 3Y*: 10.66%
• 5Y*: -4.93%
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -18.42%
• YTD: -25.36%
• 6M: -29.82%
• 1Y: -38.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCH vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-6.30%	32.55%	23.14%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-25.36%	-6.56%	100.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and EZBC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.25

Return for Risk

FLCH vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 15
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 14

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCH	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	-0.89	+1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	-1.23	+1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.86	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	-0.79	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	-1.36	+2.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCH vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCH	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	-0.89	+1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.30	-0.28

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCH	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.09%	-49.37%	-12.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.52%	-49.37%	+33.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.95%	-48.04%	+14.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.53%	-16.01%	-14.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.38%	28.42%	-21.04%

Volatility

FLCH vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 6.59%, while Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCH	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	9.43%	-2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.67%	34.44%	-20.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.22%	43.67%	-24.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.59%	50.06%	-20.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.91%	50.06%	-22.15%

FLCH vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLCH and EZBC have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLCH vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.52%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCH and EZBC in my portfolio?

FLCH and EZBC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCH or EZBC?

EZBC has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to FLCH (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs EZBC's -49.37%.

Which ETF is better, FLCH or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, FLCH leads with 8.36% vs -38.68% for EZBC. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCH or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, FLCH has performed better with a 8.36% return vs -38.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCH or EZBC?

FLCH and EZBC have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCH or EZBC?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

What is the main difference between FLCH and EZBC?

FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while EZBC is Cryptocurrency. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.