FLCG vs. SPIT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FLCG (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FLCG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.

Performance

FLCG vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCG achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 26.92% return.

FLCG

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: 2.32%
• 6M: 6.03%
• YTD: 4.23%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.32%

SPIT

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -3.14%
• 6M: 17.82%
• YTD: 26.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLCG Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF	$2.30M	$2.54M	$2.59M
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	$212.31K	$271.42K	$193.26K

FLCG vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLCG Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF	4.23%	1.49%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	26.92%	5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCG and SPIT is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.70

Return for Risk

FLCG vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLCG

FLCG Risk / Return Rank: 29
FLCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FLCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FLCG Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FLCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FLCG Martin Ratio Rank: 29

SPIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLCG vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCG	SPIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.63	—	—

Drawdowns

FLCG vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCG drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCG and SPIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCG	SPIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.95%	-12.49%	-10.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.41%	-5.71%	+3.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-2.87%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLCG	SPIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.31%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.75%	26.61%	-9.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.02%	26.61%	-5.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	26.61%	-5.59%

FLCG vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCG vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

FLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than SPIT's 5.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLCG Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.06%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	5.66%	7.18%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCG and SPIT in my portfolio?

FLCG and SPIT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLCG or SPIT?

On fees, FLCG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCG or SPIT?

FLCG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCG or SPIT?

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.05% for FLCG.

What is the main difference between FLCG and SPIT?

They also come from different issuers: Federated and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLCG and 0.89% for SPIT.