FLCG vs. FLCC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC).

FLCG and FLCC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCG is an actively managed fund by Federated Hermes. It was launched on Jul 30, 2024. FLCC is an actively managed fund by Federated Hermes. It was launched on Jul 30, 2024.

Performance

FLCG vs. FLCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLCG vs. FLCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLCG Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF	-8.71%	16.87%	12.84%
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	-4.17%	16.61%	9.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCG achieves a -8.71% return, which is significantly lower than FLCC's -4.17% return.

FLCG

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -8.71%
• 6M: -7.66%
• 1Y: 16.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLCC

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -3.60%
• YTD: -4.17%
• 6M: -2.37%
• 1Y: 15.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCG vs. FLCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCC's 0.29% expense ratio.

FLCG

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF

FLCC

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF

Return for Risk

FLCG vs. FLCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCG

FLCG Risk / Return Rank: 36
FLCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FLCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FLCG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FLCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FLCG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FLCC

FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 42
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCG vs. FLCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCG	FLCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	0.81	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	1.25	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.19	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	1.25	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.80	5.40	-1.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCG vs. FLCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the FLCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCG and FLCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCG	FLCC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	0.81	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.74	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between FLCG and FLCC is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FLCG vs. FLCC - Dividend Comparison

FLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than FLCC's 0.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
FLCG Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.06%
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	0.53%	0.50%	0.20%

Drawdowns

FLCG vs. FLCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCG drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, which is greater than FLCC's maximum drawdown of -19.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCG and FLCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCG	FLCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.95%	-19.18%	-3.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.07%	-12.79%	-2.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.97%	-5.82%	-5.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-2.49%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	2.96%	+1.55%

Volatility

FLCG vs. FLCC - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) at 5.48%. This indicates that FLCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCG	FLCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.74%	5.48%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.27%	10.30%	+1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.77%	19.25%	+3.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.67%	17.88%	+3.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.67%	17.88%	+3.79%