FLCG vs. SCHB
FLCG (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Federated Hermes, while SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. FLCG is actively managed, while SCHB is passively managed. Over the past year, FLCG returned 23.28% vs 29.95% for SCHB. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
FLCG vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCG achieves a 6.29% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 12.09% return.
FLCG
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 6.29%
- 6M
- 6.92%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 29.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 15.12%
FLCG vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FLCG Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF | 6.29% | 16.87% | 12.84% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 12.09% | 16.94% | 7.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCG and SCHB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FLCG and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLCG vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCG
SCHB
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FLCG
SCHB
Consumer Cyclical
FLCG
SCHB
Communication Services
FLCG
SCHB
Healthcare
FLCG
SCHB
Industrials
FLCG
SCHB
Financial Services
FLCG
SCHB
Consumer Defensive
FLCG
SCHB
Basic Materials
FLCG
SCHB
Energy
FLCG
SCHB
Real Estate
FLCG
-
SCHB
Utilities
FLCG
-
SCHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCG vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
FLCG
SCHB
FLCG vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 2.49 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 3.38 | -1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.45 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 3.43 | -1.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 15.78 | -10.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 2.49 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.83 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
FLCG vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCG drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCG and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -35.27% | +12.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -8.91% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | 0.00% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -4.12% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 1.94% | +2.46% |
Volatility
FLCG vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) have volatilities of 2.93% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 2.92% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 9.12% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.39% | 12.10% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 17.24% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 18.32% | +2.79% |
FLCG vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLCG vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
FLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than SCHB's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCG Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCG and SCHB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCG has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to SCHB (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCG dropped -22.95% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
On 1-year performance, SCHB leads with 29.95% vs 23.28% for FLCG. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 29.95% return vs 23.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FLCG.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.04% for FLCG.
FLCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLCG and 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCG and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer