PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCG vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCG vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCG achieves a 6.29% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 12.09% return.


FLCG

1D
-0.49%
1M
4.82%
YTD
6.29%
6M
6.92%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHB

1D
0.24%
1M
5.39%
YTD
12.09%
6M
12.44%
1Y
29.95%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCG vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLCG
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF
6.29%16.87%12.84%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
12.09%16.94%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCG and SCHB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024

0.91

The correlation between FLCG and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLCG vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCG
SCHB

Technology

53.4%
34.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.2%
10.1%

Communication Services

12.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

7.6%
8.9%

Industrials

5.8%
9.4%

Financial Services

3.7%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
4.6%

Basic Materials

0.5%
2.0%

Energy

0.2%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

FLCG
53.4%
SCHB
34.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCG
14.2%
SCHB
10.1%

Communication Services

FLCG
12.1%
SCHB
10.1%

Healthcare

FLCG
7.6%
SCHB
8.9%

Industrials

FLCG
5.8%
SCHB
9.4%

Financial Services

FLCG
3.7%
SCHB
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLCG
2.6%
SCHB
4.6%

Basic Materials

FLCG
0.5%
SCHB
2.0%

Energy

FLCG
0.2%
SCHB
3.7%

Real Estate

FLCG

-

SCHB
2.4%

Utilities

FLCG

-

SCHB
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCG vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCG
FLCG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FLCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCG vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCGSCHBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

2.49

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

3.38

-1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.43

-1.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.43

15.78

-10.35

FLCG vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCG and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCGSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.49

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.83

+0.13

Drawdowns

FLCG vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCG drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCG and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCGSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.95%

-35.27%

+12.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.07%

-8.91%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-4.12%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

1.94%

+2.46%

Volatility

FLCG vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) have volatilities of 2.93% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCGSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.92%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.50%

9.12%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

12.10%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

17.24%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

18.32%

+2.79%

FLCG vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCG vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

FLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than SCHB's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCG
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.01%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCG and SCHB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCG has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to SCHB (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCG dropped -22.95% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 1-year performance, SCHB leads with 29.95% vs 23.28% for FLCG. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 29.95% return vs 23.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FLCG.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.04% for FLCG.

FLCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLCG and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCG and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer