PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCB vs. FLJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLCB vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLCB vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLCB
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
0.08%6.95%1.59%5.72%-13.54%-1.73%7.66%0.75%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
9.29%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%6.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCB achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 9.29% return.


FLCB

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
0.08%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*

FLJH

1D
2.72%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
9.29%
6M
17.51%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLCB vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLCB vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCB
FLCB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FLCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCB vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCBFLJHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.77

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

2.43

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.36

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.32

-1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.63

12.34

-7.70

FLCB vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCB and FLJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCBFLJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.77

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

1.00

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.69

-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between FLCB and FLJH is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

FLCB vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

FLCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than FLJH's 3.57% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCB
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
4.23%4.19%4.10%3.40%2.73%2.28%3.24%0.73%0.00%0.00%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.57%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%

Drawdowns

FLCB vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCB drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, smaller than the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCB and FLJH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCBFLJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-31.51%

+12.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.57%

-11.83%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.48%

-20.39%

+1.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-5.01%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.74%

-5.39%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

3.19%

-2.26%

Volatility

FLCB vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) is 1.71%, while Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that FLCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLCBFLJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

7.76%

-6.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

14.50%

-11.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

23.00%

-18.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

18.50%

-12.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.54%

19.90%

-14.36%