PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCA vs. FIDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCA vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than FIDU's 14.14% return.


FLCA

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
7.39%
6M
10.52%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*

FIDU

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
14.14%
6M
14.45%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCA vs. FIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
7.39%34.62%13.02%14.71%-11.93%28.67%6.31%28.42%-15.55%2.65%
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
14.14%18.61%16.51%22.62%-8.36%20.96%13.72%30.69%-13.85%5.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCA and FIDU is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.69

The correlation between FLCA and FIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLCA vs. FIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCA
FIDU

Financial Services

38.7%
0.2%

Energy

17.4%
0.0%

Basic Materials

16.0%
0.2%

Industrials

10.4%
92.1%

Technology

8.3%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%

-

Utilities

2.2%
0.1%

Communication Services

0.5%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Financial Services

FLCA
38.7%
FIDU
0.2%

Energy

FLCA
17.4%
FIDU
0.0%

Basic Materials

FLCA
16.0%
FIDU
0.2%

Industrials

FLCA
10.4%
FIDU
92.1%

Technology

FLCA
8.3%
FIDU
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCA
3.3%
FIDU
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

FLCA
2.9%
FIDU

-

Utilities

FLCA
2.2%
FIDU
0.1%

Communication Services

FLCA
0.5%
FIDU
0.0%

Real Estate

FLCA
0.2%
FIDU

-

Healthcare

FLCA

-

FIDU
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCA vs. FIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCA
FLCA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FLCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCA vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCAFIDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.04

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

8.40

+5.15

FLCA vs. FIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the FIDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCA and FIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCAFIDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.51

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.71

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.66

-0.06

Drawdowns

FLCA vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FIDU drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and FIDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCAFIDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.51%

-42.31%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-12.23%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

-20.52%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-22.87%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-1.95%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-4.80%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.96%

-0.86%

Volatility

FLCA vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCAFIDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.59%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

13.60%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

16.59%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

18.29%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

20.32%

-1.26%

FLCA vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLCA vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison

FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than FIDU's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.96%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
1.73%1.85%2.50%2.49%2.20%2.02%2.49%2.29%3.03%0.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCA and FIDU have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIDU has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to FLCA (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCA dropped -41.51% vs FIDU's -42.31%.

On 5-year performance, FIDU leads with 12.89% vs 11.54% for FLCA. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FLCA has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLCA.

FLCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.96% for FIDU.

FLCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while FIDU is Industrials Equities. FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLCA and 0.08% for FIDU.

FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCA and FIDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer