PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCA vs. FGDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLCA vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLCA vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
2.36%34.62%13.02%14.71%-0.71%
FGDL
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
10.02%64.15%27.31%12.92%0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than FGDL's 10.02% return.


FLCA

1D
1.02%
1M
-4.87%
YTD
2.36%
6M
10.16%
1Y
34.23%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*

FGDL

1D
1.93%
1M
-10.91%
YTD
10.02%
6M
22.55%
1Y
52.44%
3Y*
33.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLCA vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLCA vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCA
FLCA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FLCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FGDL
FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCA vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCAFGDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.88

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

2.29

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.34

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.68

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.48

9.56

+5.92

FLCA vs. FGDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the FGDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCA and FGDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCAFGDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.88

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.55

-0.98

Correlation

The correlation between FLCA and FGDL is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLCA vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison

FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
1.81%1.85%2.50%2.49%2.20%2.02%2.49%2.29%3.03%0.09%
FGDL
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLCA vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than FGDL's maximum drawdown of -19.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and FGDL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCAFGDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.51%

-19.23%

-22.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-19.23%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

-12.10%

+7.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-3.35%

-2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

5.39%

-3.09%

Volatility

FLCA vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) is 5.71%, while Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) has a volatility of 10.10%. This indicates that FLCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLCAFGDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

10.10%

-4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

24.42%

-12.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.75%

28.02%

-11.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

18.97%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

18.97%

+0.17%