FLC vs. RYKIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and Rydex Banking Fund (RYKIX).
FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003. RYKIX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Apr 1, 1998.
Performance
FLC vs. RYKIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLC vs. RYKIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
RYKIX Rydex Banking Fund | -7.38% | 23.92% | 23.33% | 2.95% | -16.81% | 33.70% | -7.85% | 28.51% | -19.19% | 12.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLC achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly higher than RYKIX's -7.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FLC has underperformed RYKIX with an annualized return of 5.33%, while RYKIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
RYKIX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- -7.38%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLC vs. RYKIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLC has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is higher than RYKIX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLC vs. RYKIX — Risk / Return Rank
FLC
RYKIX
FLC vs. RYKIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and Rydex Banking Fund (RYKIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLC | RYKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.81 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 1.18 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 1.09 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 3.26 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLC | RYKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.81 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.23 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.33 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.06 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLC and RYKIX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLC vs. RYKIX - Dividend Comparison
FLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than RYKIX's 3.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
RYKIX Rydex Banking Fund | 3.59% | 3.32% | 3.29% | 1.46% | 3.11% | 0.48% | 2.90% | 0.59% | 2.32% | 0.36% | 0.41% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
FLC vs. RYKIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLC drawdown since its inception was -76.79%, roughly equal to the maximum RYKIX drawdown of -80.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLC and RYKIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLC | RYKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.79% | -80.14% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -15.25% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -43.99% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.27% | -51.08% | -4.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -14.88% | +8.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -27.60% | +16.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 5.11% | -2.85% |
Volatility
FLC vs. RYKIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) is 4.25%, while Rydex Banking Fund (RYKIX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that FLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYKIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLC | RYKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.13% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 14.65% | -8.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.34% | 23.75% | -12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 25.20% | -10.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 28.05% | -5.99% |