FLBR vs. FLJH

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FLBR (Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF) and FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLBR is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index, while FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLBR returned 5.13%/yr vs 20.99%/yr for FLJH. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLBR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJH.

Performance

FLBR vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBR achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 21.36% return.

FLBR

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -6.09%
• YTD: 13.23%
• 6M: 14.68%
• 1Y: 32.65%
• 3Y*: 9.89%
• 5Y*: 5.13%
• 10Y*: —

FLJH

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 21.36%
• 6M: 21.87%
• 1Y: 48.60%
• 3Y*: 27.60%
• 5Y*: 20.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBR vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF	13.23%	45.57%	-27.58%	33.19%	10.44%	-16.78%	-20.13%	28.47%	-2.13%	2.27%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	21.36%	25.26%	25.89%	36.02%	-2.75%	12.68%	10.65%	20.34%	-14.66%	1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBR and FLJH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.34

FLBR vs. FLJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLBR	FLJH
Financial Services	25.6%	15.8%
Energy	19.3%	0.9%
Basic Materials	16.5%	4.4%
Utilities	13.7%	1.2%
Industrials	11.6%	25.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.0%
Healthcare	2.8%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	12.7%
Communication Services	1.9%	8.0%
Real Estate	0.8%	3.0%
Technology	0.8%	19.4%

Return for Risk

FLBR vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBR

FLBR Risk / Return Rank: 39
FLBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FLBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FLBR Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FLBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FLBR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

FLJH

FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 88
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBR vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLBR	FLJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.57	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	3.40	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.47	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	4.52	-2.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.98	17.37	-12.39

FLBR vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBR and FLJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLBR vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBR drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than FLJH's maximum drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBR and FLJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLBR	FLJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.42%	-31.51%	-25.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.38%	-10.80%	-7.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.97%	-20.39%	-8.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.31%	-20.39%	-11.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.23%	-3.15%	-14.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.60%	-5.29%	-13.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.57%	2.81%	+3.76%

Volatility

FLBR vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) is 6.24%, while Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that FLBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLBR	FLJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.24%	7.00%	-0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.04%	14.63%	+5.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.34%	18.99%	+6.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.70%	18.71%	+8.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.00%	19.88%	+13.12%

FLBR vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLBR vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

FLBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than FLJH's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF	4.79%	7.71%	7.68%	8.84%	11.99%	8.71%	2.32%	3.42%	3.72%	0.42%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	1.84%	3.90%	5.06%	25.59%	26.67%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLBR and FLJH in my portfolio?

FLBR and FLJH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLBR or FLJH?

FLJH has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to FLBR (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBR dropped -57.42% vs FLJH's -31.51%.

Which ETF is better, FLBR or FLJH?

On 5-year performance, FLJH leads with 20.99% vs 5.13% for FLBR. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLBR has been the lower-risk option at 6.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLBR or FLJH?

Over the 5-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 20.99% return vs 5.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLBR or FLJH?

FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLBR or FLJH?

FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 1.84% for FLJH.

What is the main difference between FLBR and FLJH?

FLBR is categorized as Latin America Equities, while FLJH is Japan Equities. FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index, while FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLBR and 0.09% for FLJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.