PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLBR vs. BRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLBR vs. BRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBR achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly higher than BRF's 5.08% return.


FLBR

1D
-3.35%
1M
-10.42%
YTD
15.12%
6M
10.76%
1Y
35.11%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*

BRF

1D
-4.64%
1M
-10.08%
YTD
5.08%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
20.45%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
-3.39%
10Y*
6.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBR vs. BRF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
15.12%45.57%-27.58%33.19%10.44%-16.78%-20.13%28.47%-2.13%2.27%
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
5.08%54.17%-35.02%37.21%-14.38%-20.40%-21.07%40.66%-12.07%2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBR and BRF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.90

The correlation between FLBR and BRF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLBR vs. BRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLBR
BRF

Financial Services

28.0%
8.9%

Energy

19.4%
5.7%

Basic Materials

15.9%
12.9%

Utilities

14.7%
9.4%

Industrials

7.8%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
10.3%

Healthcare

2.7%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
14.2%

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Real Estate

0.8%
14.1%

Technology

0.7%
4.0%

Financial Services

FLBR
28.0%
BRF
8.9%

Energy

FLBR
19.4%
BRF
5.7%

Basic Materials

FLBR
15.9%
BRF
12.9%

Utilities

FLBR
14.7%
BRF
9.4%

Industrials

FLBR
7.8%
BRF
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLBR
4.5%
BRF
10.3%

Healthcare

FLBR
2.7%
BRF
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FLBR
2.4%
BRF
14.2%

Communication Services

FLBR
1.8%
BRF

-

Real Estate

FLBR
0.8%
BRF
14.1%

Technology

FLBR
0.7%
BRF
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLBR vs. BRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBR
FLBR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FLBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBR Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BRF
BRF Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRF Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRF Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBR vs. BRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLBRBRFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

0.72

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

1.14

+0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.15

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.27

+0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.93

3.58

+3.34

FLBR vs. BRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the BRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBR and BRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLBRBRFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

0.72

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

-0.11

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.06

+0.10

Drawdowns

FLBR vs. BRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBR drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, smaller than the maximum BRF drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBR and BRF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLBRBRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.42%

-82.26%

+24.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.85%

-16.11%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.97%

-37.81%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.74%

-50.49%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.85%

-48.77%

+32.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.62%

-45.74%

+27.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

5.72%

-0.64%

Volatility

FLBR vs. BRF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) is 8.12%, while VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that FLBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLBRBRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.12%

10.39%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.22%

24.39%

-3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.09%

28.46%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.69%

31.66%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.08%

33.94%

-0.86%

FLBR vs. BRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BRF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLBR vs. BRF - Dividend Comparison

FLBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than BRF's 5.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
5.28%5.54%4.08%5.02%4.13%2.96%1.66%2.54%2.89%4.53%4.25%3.84%
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
6.69%7.71%7.68%8.84%11.99%8.71%2.32%3.42%3.72%0.42%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FLBR and BRF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BRF has higher volatility (10.39%) compared to FLBR (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBR dropped -57.42% vs BRF's -82.26%.

On 5-year performance, FLBR leads with 5.54% vs -3.39% for BRF. On fees, FLBR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLBR has been the lower-risk option at 8.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLBR has performed better with a 5.54% return vs -3.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLBR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BRF.

FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 6.69%, compared with 5.28% for BRF.

FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index, while BRF tracks MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLBR and 0.60% for BRF.

FLBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLBR and BRF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer