PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLBDX vs. APFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLBDX
Meeder Tactical Income Fund
-0.15%7.28%6.64%7.10%-2.05%
APFPX
Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund
4.02%10.21%11.33%6.67%6.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBDX achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than APFPX's 4.02% return.


FLBDX

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
1.20%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
6.43%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
3.13%

APFPX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.15%
YTD
4.02%
6M
7.27%
1Y
12.99%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLBDX vs. APFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than APFPX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLBDX vs. APFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBDX
FLBDX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

APFPX
APFPX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
APFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
APFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLBDXAPFPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

5.02

-3.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

7.27

-4.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

2.27

-0.86

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

6.23

-3.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.12

30.52

-22.40

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the APFPX Sharpe Ratio of 5.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBDX and APFPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLBDXAPFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

5.02

-3.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

3.73

-2.77

Correlation

The correlation between FLBDX and APFPX is -0.29. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Dividend Comparison

FLBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than APFPX's 4.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLBDX
Meeder Tactical Income Fund
4.63%4.67%4.35%3.57%1.68%1.56%1.81%2.32%2.03%2.70%2.90%2.78%
APFPX
Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund
4.92%4.01%6.18%6.89%8.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBDX drawdown since its inception was -8.74%, which is greater than APFPX's maximum drawdown of -2.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBDX and APFPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLBDXAPFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-2.10%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.20%

-1.73%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

0.00%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-0.25%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.41%

+0.24%

Volatility

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) is 1.05%, while Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that FLBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLBDXAPFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.24%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.64%

1.86%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52%

2.64%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.65%

2.75%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.93%

2.75%

+0.18%