FLBDX vs. APFPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLBDX (Meeder Tactical Income Fund) and APFPX (Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, FLBDX returned 7.19%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for APFPX. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. FLBDX charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for APFPX.

Performance

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBDX achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than APFPX's 4.00% return.

FLBDX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 7.84%
• 3Y*: 7.19%
• 5Y*: 3.26%
• 10Y*: 3.18%

APFPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 5.16%
• 1Y: 12.02%
• 3Y*: 9.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund	2.07%	7.28%	6.64%	7.10%	-2.05%
APFPX Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund	4.00%	10.21%	11.33%	6.67%	6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBDX and APFPX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	-0.30

The correlation between FLBDX and APFPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (3 years) to -0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLBDX vs. APFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBDX

FLBDX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FLBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FLBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FLBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

APFPX

APFPX Risk / Return Rank: 99
APFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
APFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
APFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLBDX	APFPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.32	4.91	-1.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.12	7.19	-2.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	2.25	-0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	13.50	-8.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.19	61.50	-42.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is lower than the APFPX Sharpe Ratio of 4.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBDX and APFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLBDX	APFPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.32	4.91	-1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	3.54	-2.55

Drawdowns

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBDX drawdown since its inception was -8.74%, which is greater than APFPX's maximum drawdown of -2.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBDX and APFPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLBDX	APFPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.74%	-2.10%	-6.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.65%	-0.90%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.51%	-2.02%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.33%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-0.25%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	0.20%	+0.21%

Volatility

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Volatility Comparison

Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) at 0.48%. This indicates that FLBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLBDX	APFPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	0.48%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.81%	2.09%	-0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37%	2.47%	-0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.67%	2.76%	-0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.94%	2.76%	+0.18%

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than APFPX's 1.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLBDX vs. APFPX - Dividend Comparison

FLBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, which matches APFPX's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APFPX Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund	4.59%	4.01%	6.18%	6.89%	8.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund	4.58%	4.67%	4.35%	3.57%	1.68%	1.56%	1.81%	2.32%	2.03%	2.70%	2.90%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLBDX and APFPX in my portfolio?

FLBDX and APFPX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLBDX or APFPX?

FLBDX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to APFPX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBDX dropped -8.74% vs APFPX's -2.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.91 vs 3.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.