PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APFPX vs. RPIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APFPX vs. RPIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APFPX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly higher than RPIDX's 0.16% return.


APFPX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.11%
YTD
4.09%
6M
4.40%
1Y
11.47%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
10Y*

RPIDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.16%
6M
1.55%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
8.03%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APFPX vs. RPIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
APFPX
Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund
4.09%10.21%11.33%6.67%6.73%
RPIDX
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund
0.16%9.74%9.92%4.72%1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between APFPX and RPIDX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APFPX vs. RPIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APFPX
APFPX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
APFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

RPIDX
RPIDX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RPIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APFPX vs. RPIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APFPXRPIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.16

1.48

+0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.89

5.07

+7.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

55.94

12.83

+43.11

APFPX vs. RPIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APFPX Sharpe Ratio is 4.65, which is higher than the RPIDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APFPX and RPIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APFPX vs. RPIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APFPX drawdown since its inception was -2.10%, smaller than the maximum RPIDX drawdown of -19.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APFPX and RPIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APFPXRPIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-19.95%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-1.34%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.02%

-3.17%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.86%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-1.86%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

0.53%

-0.32%

Volatility

APFPX vs. RPIDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) is 0.59%, while T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that APFPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APFPXRPIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

0.68%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.12%

2.56%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49%

3.34%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

3.82%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.75%

4.78%

-2.03%

APFPX vs. RPIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APFPX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

APFPX vs. RPIDX - Dividend Comparison

APFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than RPIDX's 9.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
APFPX
Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund
4.58%4.01%6.18%6.89%8.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RPIDX
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund
9.93%9.91%9.20%6.64%7.97%5.34%7.14%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


APFPX and RPIDX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPIDX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to APFPX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APFPX dropped -2.10% vs RPIDX's -19.95%.

APFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.64 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APFPX and RPIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer