PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLARX vs. BGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLARX vs. BGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class A (FLARX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLARX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than BGT's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FLARX has underperformed BGT with an annualized return of 3.69%, while BGT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.41% annualized return.


FLARX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.61%
6M
2.37%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
3.69%

BGT

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.35%
1Y
-1.61%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
6.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLARX vs. BGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLARX
Victory Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class A
1.61%4.55%7.40%8.89%-3.77%4.17%0.94%7.23%-0.32%3.41%
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
0.26%-0.84%16.12%26.29%-16.57%25.89%-0.81%18.97%-11.95%3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FLARX and BGT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2007

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLARX vs. BGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLARX
FLARX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FLARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FLARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLARX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BGT
BGT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLARX vs. BGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class A (FLARX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLARXBGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

0.98

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

-0.15

+4.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.98

-0.31

+14.29

FLARX vs. BGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLARX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the BGT Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLARX and BGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLARX vs. BGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLARX drawdown since its inception was -30.68%, smaller than the maximum BGT drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLARX and BGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLARXBGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-58.06%

+27.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.04%

-11.06%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.10%

-15.91%

+13.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.79%

-23.19%

+16.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.52%

-41.90%

+22.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-5.85%

+5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-8.11%

+6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

5.14%

-4.81%

Volatility

FLARX vs. BGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class A (FLARX) is 0.72%, while BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that FLARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLARXBGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

1.46%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

7.02%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46%

9.95%

-7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.69%

13.56%

-10.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.63%

15.34%

-11.71%

FLARX vs. BGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLARX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BGT's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLARX vs. BGT - Dividend Comparison

FLARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, less than BGT's 13.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
13.57%12.74%11.22%10.36%6.87%5.55%7.58%6.33%6.64%5.03%5.03%6.04%
FLARX
Victory Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class A
6.97%7.17%6.29%6.97%4.94%3.15%3.57%4.68%4.36%3.80%3.55%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLARX and BGT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGT has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to FLARX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLARX dropped -30.68% vs BGT's -58.06%.

FLARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLARX and BGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer