FKURF vs. SIVR
FKURF (Fujikura Ltd) is a stock, while SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Over the past year, FKURF returned -37.91% vs 114.25% for SIVR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FKURF vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKURF achieves a -71.53% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 4.05% return.
FKURF
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -21.54%
- YTD
- -71.53%
- 6M
- -70.67%
- 1Y
- -37.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 29.45%
- 1Y
- 114.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.03%
- 5Y*
- 21.28%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
FKURF vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FKURF Fujikura Ltd | -71.53% | 147.24% | 480.56% | -8.86% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 4.05% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FKURF and SIVR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FKURF vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
FKURF
SIVR
FKURF vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fujikura Ltd (FKURF) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FKURF | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 2.71 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 5.80 | -6.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FKURF | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 1.95 | -2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.32 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
FKURF vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKURF drawdown since its inception was -87.49%, which is greater than SIVR's maximum drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKURF and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKURF | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.49% | -75.85% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.49% | -42.42% | -45.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.19% | -36.52% | -48.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.21% | -47.85% | +35.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.92% | 19.78% | +17.14% |
Volatility
FKURF vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
Fujikura Ltd (FKURF) has a higher volatility of 46.62% compared to abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) at 16.32%. This indicates that FKURF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FKURF | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.62% | 16.32% | +30.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 197.15% | 58.30% | +138.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.84% | 58.84% | +66.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.40% | 36.17% | +57.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.40% | 31.86% | +61.54% |
Dividends
FKURF vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither FKURF nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FKURF Fujikura Ltd | 0.00% | 0.29% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FKURF and SIVR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FKURF has higher volatility (46.62%) compared to SIVR (16.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKURF dropped -87.49% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FKURF and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer