FKRCX vs. FGADX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX).
FKRCX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 18, 1969. FGADX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2010.
Performance
FKRCX vs. FGADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FKRCX vs. FGADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund | 5.72% | 196.59% | 17.64% | 2.03% | -23.47% | -4.03% | 44.30% | 51.48% | -18.11% | -0.12% |
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 5.78% | 197.29% | 17.98% | 2.20% | -23.24% | -3.76% | 44.60% | 51.87% | -17.89% | 0.06% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FKRCX having a 5.72% return and FGADX slightly higher at 5.78%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FKRCX having a 18.12% annualized return and FGADX not far ahead at 18.40%.
FKRCX
- 1D
- 8.11%
- 1M
- -21.42%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 29.26%
- 1Y
- 121.53%
- 3Y*
- 51.10%
- 5Y*
- 24.45%
- 10Y*
- 18.12%
FGADX
- 1D
- 8.13%
- 1M
- -21.41%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 122.00%
- 3Y*
- 51.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.76%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FKRCX vs. FGADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKRCX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FGADX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FKRCX vs. FGADX — Risk / Return Rank
FKRCX
FGADX
FKRCX vs. FGADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FKRCX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.85 | 2.86 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | 3.02 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 3.95 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.65 | 14.72 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FKRCX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.86 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.75 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.27 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FKRCX and FGADX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FKRCX vs. FGADX - Dividend Comparison
FKRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.16%, more than FGADX's 9.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund | 10.16% | 10.75% | 13.44% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 9.37% | 10.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 8.73% |
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 9.28% | 9.81% | 12.51% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 8.83% | 10.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 8.38% |
Drawdowns
FKRCX vs. FGADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKRCX drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, roughly equal to the maximum FGADX drawdown of -78.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKRCX and FGADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKRCX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.85% | -78.57% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.15% | -31.15% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.79% | -48.77% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | -49.27% | -0.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.42% | -21.41% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.79% | -34.81% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | 8.36% | 0.00% |
Volatility
FKRCX vs. FGADX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) have volatilities of 18.27% and 18.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FKRCX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.27% | 18.27% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.19% | 35.18% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.05% | 43.06% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.27% | 33.13% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 32.83% | +0.07% |