PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKIQX vs. CONWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKIQX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Fund Class A (FKIQX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKIQX achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than CONWX's 7.66% return.


FKIQX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
5.13%
6M
5.55%
1Y
14.25%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*

CONWX

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
7.66%
6M
7.52%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
8.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKIQX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FKIQX
Franklin Income Fund Class A
5.13%11.66%7.04%8.57%-5.59%17.58%3.46%15.69%-6.59%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
7.66%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%16.84%-9.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FKIQX and CONWX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2018

0.73

The correlation between FKIQX and CONWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKIQX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKIQX
FKIQX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FKIQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKIQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKIQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FKIQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKIQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKIQX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Fund Class A (FKIQX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKIQXCONWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.44

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.68

4.58

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.32

13.26

+5.07

FKIQX vs. CONWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKIQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the CONWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKIQX and CONWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKIQXCONWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.42

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.65

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.77

-0.07

Drawdowns

FKIQX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKIQX drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, roughly equal to the maximum CONWX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKIQX and CONWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKIQXCONWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.31%

-26.09%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-3.68%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-9.86%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

-12.49%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.50%

+2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-2.78%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

1.27%

-0.49%

Volatility

FKIQX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Fund Class A (FKIQX) is 0.97%, while Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that FKIQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKIQXCONWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

1.56%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.60%

5.16%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.92%

6.97%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.87%

10.20%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.12%

11.10%

-0.98%

FKIQX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKIQX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKIQX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison

FKIQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than CONWX's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.43%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%
FKIQX
Franklin Income Fund Class A
5.45%5.08%5.52%5.45%5.35%6.40%5.14%5.03%1.38%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKIQX and CONWX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CONWX has higher volatility (1.56%) compared to FKIQX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKIQX dropped -25.31% vs CONWX's -26.09%.

FKIQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKIQX and CONWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer