PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKIQX vs. FASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKIQX vs. FASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Fund Class A (FKIQX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKIQX achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than FASDX's 13.85% return.


FKIQX

1D
0.39%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.65%
YTD
5.59%
1Y
11.83%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.96%

FASDX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.03%
6M
9.57%
YTD
13.85%
1Y
21.79%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
9.21%
ALL TIME*
8.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FKIQX vs. FASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FKIQX
Franklin Income Fund Class A
5.59%11.66%7.04%8.57%-5.59%17.58%3.46%15.69%-6.59%
FASDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A
13.85%12.72%11.19%9.15%-10.11%18.65%11.00%22.17%-7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FKIQX and FASDX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

0.78

The correlation between FKIQX and FASDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKIQX vs. FASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FKIQX
FKIQX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FKIQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKIQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKIQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FKIQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKIQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FASDX
FASDX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FKIQX vs. FASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Fund Class A (FKIQX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKIQXFASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.46

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

3.54

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

14.95

-0.34

FKIQX vs. FASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKIQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKIQX and FASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKIQX vs. FASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKIQX drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, smaller than the maximum FASDX drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKIQX and FASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKIQXFASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.31%

-59.09%

+33.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-5.81%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-12.62%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

-17.27%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.46%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-6.46%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

1.38%

-0.60%

Volatility

FKIQX vs. FASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Fund Class A (FKIQX) is 1.50%, while Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX) has a volatility of 1.91%. This indicates that FKIQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKIQXFASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.91%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

6.52%

-2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.93%

8.38%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.78%

10.95%

-3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.04%

12.39%

-2.35%

FKIQX vs. FASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKIQX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than FASDX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKIQX vs. FASDX - Dividend Comparison

FKIQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, less than FASDX's 6.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A
6.73%7.75%5.04%5.48%3.98%8.22%5.45%6.46%7.92%6.39%4.68%6.13%
FKIQX
Franklin Income Fund Class A
5.04%5.08%5.52%5.45%5.35%6.40%5.14%5.03%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKIQX and FASDX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASDX has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to FKIQX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKIQX dropped -25.31% vs FASDX's -59.09%.

FASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKIQX and FASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer