PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKEMX vs. FMCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKEMX vs. FMCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKEMX achieves a 28.27% return, which is significantly higher than FMCSX's 17.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FKEMX having a 12.50% annualized return and FMCSX not far ahead at 12.77%.


FKEMX

1D
1.68%
1M
9.77%
YTD
28.27%
6M
30.74%
1Y
58.68%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
12.50%

FMCSX

1D
1.64%
1M
3.81%
YTD
17.37%
6M
18.71%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKEMX vs. FMCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKEMX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K
28.27%31.18%7.26%15.36%-27.42%1.40%32.68%33.86%-17.92%46.97%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
17.37%11.80%14.55%11.02%-6.40%28.64%11.43%25.39%-6.67%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FKEMX and FMCSX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.67

The correlation between FKEMX and FMCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKEMX vs. FMCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKEMX
FKEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FKEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FKEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FMCSX
FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKEMX vs. FMCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKEMXFMCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.37

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

3.83

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.22

14.86

+2.36

FKEMX vs. FMCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the FMCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKEMX and FMCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKEMXFMCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

2.10

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.59

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.69

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.58

-0.35

Drawdowns

FKEMX vs. FMCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKEMX drawdown since its inception was -69.07%, which is greater than FMCSX's maximum drawdown of -62.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKEMX and FMCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKEMXFMCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.07%

-62.19%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-8.55%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-22.33%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.79%

-22.33%

-18.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

-40.55%

-2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-9.35%

-11.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.20%

+1.22%

Volatility

FKEMX vs. FMCSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) at 5.04%. This indicates that FKEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKEMXFMCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

5.04%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

12.28%

+3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.96%

15.58%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

17.72%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

18.60%

+0.09%

FKEMX vs. FMCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKEMX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FMCSX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKEMX vs. FMCSX - Dividend Comparison

FKEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than FMCSX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKEMX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K
0.05%0.07%0.78%1.24%0.89%6.18%1.46%1.85%1.00%0.08%0.84%0.70%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
1.56%1.83%8.94%2.60%5.44%12.80%6.72%6.63%18.48%6.66%8.25%14.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKEMX and FMCSX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKEMX has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to FMCSX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKEMX dropped -69.07% vs FMCSX's -62.19%.

FKEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKEMX and FMCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer