FKEMX vs. GICIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX).
FKEMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. GICIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Sep 27, 2007.
Performance
FKEMX vs. GICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FKEMX vs. GICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKEMX Fidelity Emerging Markets K | 0.98% | 31.18% | 7.26% | 15.36% | -27.42% | 1.40% | 32.68% | 33.86% | -17.92% | 46.97% |
GICIX Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund | 2.90% | 42.83% | 5.57% | 15.11% | -18.53% | 13.03% | 7.69% | 21.59% | -18.80% | 33.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKEMX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than GICIX's 2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FKEMX has outperformed GICIX with an annualized return of 10.08%, while GICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.23% annualized return.
FKEMX
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -7.62%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 33.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
GICIX
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- -9.56%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 37.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FKEMX vs. GICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKEMX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than GICIX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FKEMX vs. GICIX — Risk / Return Rank
FKEMX
GICIX
FKEMX vs. GICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FKEMX | GICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 2.32 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 2.88 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.44 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.61 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 10.74 | -1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FKEMX | GICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.32 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.53 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.38 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FKEMX and GICIX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FKEMX vs. GICIX - Dividend Comparison
FKEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than GICIX's 7.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKEMX Fidelity Emerging Markets K | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 0.89% | 6.18% | 1.46% | 1.85% | 1.00% | 0.08% | 0.84% | 0.70% |
GICIX Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund | 7.86% | 8.08% | 4.77% | 3.04% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 1.87% | 3.47% | 1.68% | 8.29% | 2.79% | 1.69% |
Drawdowns
FKEMX vs. GICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKEMX drawdown since its inception was -69.07%, which is greater than GICIX's maximum drawdown of -56.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKEMX and GICIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKEMX | GICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.07% | -56.71% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.00% | -13.39% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.79% | -34.53% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.13% | -43.84% | +0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.97% | -10.48% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.49% | -11.00% | -10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 3.26% | +0.21% |
Volatility
FKEMX vs. GICIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) at 7.86%. This indicates that FKEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FKEMX | GICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 7.86% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.56% | 11.60% | +2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.60% | 16.41% | +3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 16.37% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 16.68% | +1.78% |