FKEMX vs. FEMKX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FKEMX (Fidelity Emerging Markets K) and FEMKX (Fidelity Emerging Markets) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FKEMX returned 12.49%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for FEMKX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FKEMX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FEMKX.

Performance

FKEMX vs. FEMKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FKEMX having a 27.96% return and FEMKX slightly lower at 27.91%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FKEMX having a 12.49% annualized return and FEMKX not far behind at 12.36%.

FKEMX

• 1D: 3.63%
• 1M: 7.13%
• YTD: 27.96%
• 6M: 30.02%
• 1Y: 55.31%
• 3Y*: 22.11%
• 5Y*: 7.73%
• 10Y*: 12.49%

FEMKX

• 1D: 3.64%
• 1M: 7.14%
• YTD: 27.91%
• 6M: 29.94%
• 1Y: 55.13%
• 3Y*: 21.96%
• 5Y*: 7.60%
• 10Y*: 12.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKEMX vs. FEMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKEMX Fidelity Emerging Markets K	27.96%	31.18%	7.26%	15.36%	-27.42%	1.40%	32.68%	33.86%	-17.92%	46.97%
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets	27.91%	31.02%	7.12%	15.16%	-27.48%	1.25%	32.56%	33.67%	-18.03%	46.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FKEMX and FEMKX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008	1.00

The correlation between FKEMX and FEMKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FKEMX vs. FEMKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKEMX

FKEMX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FKEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FKEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FKEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FKEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FKEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FEMKX

FEMKX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FEMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FEMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FEMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FEMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FEMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKEMX vs. FEMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FKEMX	FEMKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.52	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.14	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.47	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.23	4.19	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.06	14.95	+0.11

FKEMX vs. FEMKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the FEMKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKEMX and FEMKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FKEMX vs. FEMKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKEMX drawdown since its inception was -69.07%, roughly equal to the maximum FEMKX drawdown of -71.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKEMX and FEMKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKEMX	FEMKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.07%	-71.14%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.00%	-13.00%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	-19.13%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.79%	-40.88%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.13%	-43.24%	+0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.23%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.26%	-25.92%	+4.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	3.64%	-0.01%

Volatility

FKEMX vs. FEMKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) have volatilities of 11.89% and 11.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKEMX	FEMKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.89%	11.90%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.32%	19.29%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.64%	21.60%	+0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.51%	19.48%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.97%	18.96%	+0.01%

FKEMX vs. FEMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKEMX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMKX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKEMX vs. FEMKX - Dividend Comparison

FKEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, more than FEMKX's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets	0.04%	0.05%	0.65%	1.11%	0.77%	6.00%	1.39%	1.71%	0.83%	0.08%	0.67%	0.51%
FKEMX Fidelity Emerging Markets K	0.05%	0.07%	0.78%	1.24%	0.89%	6.18%	1.46%	1.85%	1.00%	0.08%	0.84%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKEMX and FEMKX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FKEMX and FEMKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FKEMX or FEMKX?

FEMKX has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to FKEMX (11.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKEMX dropped -69.07% vs FEMKX's -71.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.