PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCSX vs. FSSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCSX vs. FSSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCSX achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly lower than FSSMX's 18.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCSX has outperformed FSSMX with an annualized return of 12.33%, while FSSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.29% annualized return.


FMCSX

1D
1.17%
1M
-3.33%
6M
11.06%
YTD
14.84%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
12.33%
ALL TIME*
11.60%

FSSMX

1D
1.24%
1M
-2.13%
6M
13.57%
YTD
18.67%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
11.29%
ALL TIME*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FMCSX vs. FSSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
14.84%11.80%14.55%11.02%-6.40%28.64%11.43%25.39%-6.67%18.03%
FSSMX
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund
18.67%2.35%12.50%17.16%-13.90%23.25%13.03%29.57%-7.70%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCSX and FSSMX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2012

0.97

The correlation between FMCSX and FSSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCSX vs. FSSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMCSX
FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FSSMX
FSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMCSX vs. FSSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMCSXFSSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

1.54

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

4.89

+3.87

FMCSX vs. FSSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the FSSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCSX and FSSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMCSX vs. FSSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCSX drawdown since its inception was -62.19%, which is greater than FSSMX's maximum drawdown of -43.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCSX and FSSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCSXFSSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.19%

-43.37%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-9.78%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.33%

-22.82%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-24.00%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.55%

-43.37%

+2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-3.61%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-5.04%

-4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

3.10%

-0.64%

Volatility

FMCSX vs. FSSMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCSXFSSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

4.09%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

12.85%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

18.59%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

20.31%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.56%

21.12%

-2.56%

FMCSX vs. FSSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCSX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FSSMX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMCSX vs. FSSMX - Dividend Comparison

FMCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, while FSSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
5.40%1.83%8.94%2.60%5.44%12.80%6.72%6.63%18.48%6.66%8.25%14.18%
FSSMX
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%3.10%0.78%9.73%12.87%2.31%4.03%21.01%4.12%0.92%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FMCSX and FSSMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMCSX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to FSSMX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCSX dropped -62.19% vs FSSMX's -43.37%.

FMCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCSX and FSSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer