FKEMX vs. EMF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FKEMX (Fidelity Emerging Markets K) and EMF (Templeton Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FKEMX returned 12.34%/yr vs 15.39%/yr for EMF. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FKEMX charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for EMF.

Performance

FKEMX vs. EMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKEMX achieves a 26.40% return, which is significantly lower than EMF's 40.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FKEMX has underperformed EMF with an annualized return of 12.34%, while EMF has yielded a comparatively higher 15.39% annualized return.

FKEMX

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: 26.40%
• 6M: 28.71%
• 1Y: 54.50%
• 3Y*: 23.33%
• 5Y*: 7.02%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

EMF

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 10.04%
• YTD: 40.06%
• 6M: 47.44%
• 1Y: 88.16%
• 3Y*: 36.03%
• 5Y*: 11.43%
• 10Y*: 15.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKEMX vs. EMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKEMX Fidelity Emerging Markets K	26.40%	31.18%	7.26%	15.36%	-27.42%	1.40%	32.68%	33.86%	-17.92%	46.97%
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund	40.06%	58.20%	6.56%	8.84%	-21.53%	-8.23%	24.48%	27.20%	-14.78%	53.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FKEMX and EMF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008	0.81

The correlation between FKEMX and EMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FKEMX vs. EMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKEMX

FKEMX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FKEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FKEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FKEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FKEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FKEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EMF

EMF Risk / Return Rank: 92
EMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EMF Omega Ratio Rank: 91
EMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EMF Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKEMX vs. EMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FKEMX	EMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	3.89	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	4.67	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.69	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.38	4.55	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.57	18.17	-1.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FKEMX vs. EMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the EMF Sharpe Ratio of 3.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKEMX and EMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FKEMX	EMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	3.89	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.56	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.75	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.23	0.00

Drawdowns

FKEMX vs. EMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKEMX drawdown since its inception was -69.07%, smaller than the maximum EMF drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKEMX and EMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKEMX	EMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.07%	-76.97%	+7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.00%	-19.48%	+6.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	-19.48%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.79%	-45.62%	+4.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.13%	-47.65%	+4.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-2.68%	+1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.30%	-28.99%	+7.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	4.87%	-1.45%

Volatility

FKEMX vs. EMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) is 8.11%, while Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that FKEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKEMX	EMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.11%	8.94%	-0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.16%	20.16%	-4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.01%	22.83%	-3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	20.50%	-1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.69%	20.58%	-1.89%

FKEMX vs. EMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKEMX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than EMF's 1.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKEMX vs. EMF - Dividend Comparison

FKEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than EMF's 7.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund	7.03%	9.73%	4.28%	6.22%	9.89%	6.92%	3.51%	7.36%	5.92%	12.11%	1.62%	12.81%
FKEMX Fidelity Emerging Markets K	0.05%	0.07%	0.78%	1.24%	0.89%	6.18%	1.46%	1.85%	1.00%	0.08%	0.84%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKEMX and EMF in my portfolio?

FKEMX and EMF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FKEMX or EMF?

EMF has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to FKEMX (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKEMX dropped -69.07% vs EMF's -76.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.