PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMF vs. SCHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMF vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMF achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly higher than SCHE's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EMF has outperformed SCHE with an annualized return of 13.35%, while SCHE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.97% annualized return.


EMF

1D
1.68%
1M
-5.02%
6M
9.69%
YTD
27.21%
1Y
55.05%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
13.35%
ALL TIME*
6.56%

SCHE

1D
0.87%
1M
0.50%
6M
4.90%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
7.97%
ALL TIME*
4.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.08M$849.02K$917.55K
$121.98M$115.93M$116.46M

EMF vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMF
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
27.21%58.20%6.56%8.84%-21.53%-8.23%24.48%27.20%-14.78%53.55%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
10.15%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%20.31%-13.57%32.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EMF and SCHE is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010

0.85

The correlation between EMF and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMF vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMF
EMF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMF Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMF vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMFSCHEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.23

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

1.94

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.04

6.43

+2.61

EMF vs. SCHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the SCHE Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMF and SCHE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMF vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMF drawdown since its inception was -76.97%, which is greater than SCHE's maximum drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMF and SCHE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMFSCHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.97%

-36.20%

-40.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.48%

-11.29%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.48%

-17.08%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.33%

-31.38%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.65%

-36.20%

-11.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.30%

-3.13%

-10.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.90%

-12.51%

-16.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

3.40%

+2.75%

Volatility

EMF vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) at 5.70%. This indicates that EMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMFSCHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.86%

5.70%

+4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.40%

15.60%

+7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.33%

17.99%

+8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

17.87%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

19.44%

+1.42%

EMF vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMF has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMF vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison

EMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, more than SCHE's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMF
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
7.91%9.73%4.28%6.22%9.89%6.92%3.51%7.36%5.92%12.11%1.62%12.81%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.64%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMF and SCHE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMF has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to SCHE (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMF dropped -76.97% vs SCHE's -36.20%.

EMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMF and SCHE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer